Building and Assessing Skills Through Failure and Feedback Instead of Grades

In the trades, no one cares about how well you can recite a textbook definition or ace a multiple-choice test. Employers care about one thing: what you can do with your hands, your mind, your tools, and your time. Yet, much of traditional education is still mired in testing memory rather than building skill. At Trade Smart College, we’ve turned this approach on its head, focusing instead on methods that mirror real-world learning—failure, repetition, and constructive feedback.

Professional tradespeople are judged on their reliability, efficiency, and adaptability, not their ability to regurgitate facts. It’s a world where being prepared to meet challenges head-on matters far more than knowing the theory of why a pipe bursts. That’s why we emphasize skill development through practice rather than evaluation through grades. And we focus most of our in-class time on building professional skills, because these are the skills that get people jobs, and allow them to keep them.

Why Testing Memory Cannot Develop Skill

Imagine asking a plumber to fix your leaking sink based solely on the fact that they scored 95% on their plumbing theory exam. It sounds absurd because tradespeople are hired for what they can do, not for the grades they earned. Testing memory cannot develop skill. Skill, whether physical or mental, can only be developed through practice, critical feedback, and repetition.

In the trades, this means the difference between someone who knows the steps in theory and one who can apply them under pressure. By embracing failure as part of the learning process, students become adaptable problem-solvers, ready to tackle the unexpected.

The Role of Feedback in Building Prepared and Reliable Workers

Feedback is often treated as an afterthought in traditional education, delivered as a letter grade or a few cursory comments on an exam. But feedback, when given correctly, is a powerful tool for growth. Constructive feedback allows students to understand not only what they did wrong but also how to improve.

A “meta-analysis”, published in Educational Technology Research and Development, of the research on learning from failure concluded that while there is more research to be done, students who experience the failure and feedback cycle do better at building skills than those who are not given this opportunity. This is especially true for “professional” skills, and that is why, at Trade Smart College, we ensure that we provide meaningful guidance to our students. It’s through this process that students learn to adjust, refine, and eventually master their craft.

Turning Mistakes into Mastery

In the trades, mistakes aren’t the end of the world—they’re the beginning of understanding. When an entry-level employee makes a mistake, they can be told how to correct it and how to prevent it from happening in other circumstances. This iterative process turns mistakes into stepping stones toward mastery, preparing students for the realities of a career in the trades.

In many cases, benefitting from this process depends on the student having the right mindset. Thiel and Semrau (2022) show that feedback on failure can trigger defensiveness and denial, or it can promote learning, and the difference between these two reactions boils down to a person’s openness to criticism. This is why we spend so much time in class helping students learn the skills of learning, including a receptiveness to criticism. Because it doesn’t matter how well a person can pull wire or cut metal, they will never get better if they’re not open to learning.

Why Grades Don’t Predict Workplace Success

For decades, grades have been the yardstick of academic success. But in the trades, they’re virtually irrelevant. No client asks about your GPA when you’re fixing their heating system; they care about how quickly, efficiently, and reliably you get the job done.

Employers in the trades look at one thing: the quality of your work. This focus on deliverables rather than abstract scores is why Trade Smart College avoids traditional grading models in favor of practical evaluations. Students demonstrate their skills through real-world tasks, not exams. This not only makes them more prepared to hit the ground running but also builds confidence in their ability to deliver results.

The Bottom Line

Building skills through failure and feedback isn’t just a novel teaching approach—it’s a philosophy that reflects the realities of the trades. Students emerge from this process as prepared, reliable, efficient, and adaptable professionals ready to meet the demands of their field. They don’t just know how to perform tasks; they understand the “why” behind their work, making them invaluable assets to their employers.

At Trade Smart College, we believe in training students the way the real world works: by giving them opportunities to learn through doing, failing, and improving. Because in the end, it’s not about the grades you earn—it’s about the skills you bring to the table.

References:

Darabi, A., Arrington, T.L. & Sayilir, E. Learning from failure: a meta-analysis of the empirical studies. Education Tech Research Dev 66, 1101–1118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9579-9.

Thiel K and Semrau T (2022) Learning from failure feedback for subsequent task performance: A matter of personality? Frontiers in Psychology. 13:1032273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032273.